Something for everyone: http://www.pylons.org

That big entrance looking thing in the last image.

For egress one can always incorporate a door for emergency exit, elsewhere. This openable 'partition' need not be for emergency function. Of all the other examples this is the best.

It's about identity. Not about costs. But I suppose you're a German, who knows it penny wise.

It's not like she’d said “The best thing about being LGBT is that you can do whatever you want in the workplace and then when someone pulls you up on it, you simply pull the 'you have a problem with LGBT' card” or anything!

And besides, he’d missed the point entirely! Her REAL point was that all people are equal, including LBGT people. Silly Tom for not reading between the lines. LBGT people really should stop inventing problems. No one cares if they’re LBGT, as long as they’re good at their job. They shouldn’t assume they’re colleagues are homophobic and hide their sexuality. That’s reverse homophobic!

And herein lies the crux, Sally. I would like to know why those LBGT people aren’t out at work. It is a failure of the survey that this isn’t more clear. However, unlike you, I won't assume they’re all making mountains out of molehills. Instead, I’d like to listen to them. The world has come a long way in not much time, but that doesn’t mean that homophobia has completely gone and it’s time to stop talking about it. If you are truly indifferent to the sexuality of your colleagues (assuming you actually work in the construction industry and aren’t just some Russian Troll) then well done you. Don’t assume everyone else is so enlightened.

By the way, what is the reason for double-slab sloping roofs? To cover or give protection to insulation and waterproofing?

You're right. I don't know. You give the impression you do. How many?

All around us. Googling "LGBT workplace discrimination" will help you become familiar with it. Or you can click on the three links I posted above that shows specific statistics. For many who cannot fathom the commonplace nature of such discrimination, denial and ignorance are comfortable manners of engaging, because they help us feel good about the current state of the world and appeal to our laziness and inertia, but they're no way forward on any subject, especially one as important as this.

This seemed like a promising avenue of design innovation regarding small electronics. Unfortunately it never seemed to go anywhere, I'm guessing because we are all just so thrilled at the idea of acquiring totally NEW products, without any thought to where they come from or where they end up.

The waste rampant in the world is still primarily a problem of our insatiable demand for novelty and our unwillingness to pay the true price of the entire life cycle of any product. Disposability is a feature of most products from the drawing board, unless specifically addressed in the design process, as these guys illuminate.

We could end waste overnight if we were willing to change our consuming habits. We would have to demand from producers, and become willing to pay for clothing, furniture and household items that lasted decades instead of months, and refuse to buy disposable cheap crap.

Good luck with the adoption of those practices, I'm afraid. This project at least aims to get people to think about some of this stuff.

I think that American Airlines tail design (only) works. Generally the tail design has nothing to do with the total rebranding.

1. I wouldn't send the rocket just in the Mars direction, but I would want the rocket to orbit the planet once and then return to the Earth. So I could also test the landing procedure of the rocket after such a long time in space.
2. If Musk was so afraid of the launch it means that he is not 100% sure of the rocket.
3. See 1.
4. The payload is the least important factor. It could be just sand.